|
September 16, 2009 -
LATEST MISSION 261 UPDATE
At the Council Meeting on
September 15th the Mission 261 developer requested more time to develop
a plan that was in keeping with the "spirit" of the Mission District
Specific Plan. His lawyer indicated that he hoped to meet with the
community. Based on their request, Council agreed to suspend the
project for 6 months. Council also continued the appeal of the project
which is a good thing. Council did not provide any instructions other
than re-noticing the public when the hearing resumes.
August 31, 2009
Since March of this year, the SGHA Board has lent
its support to an appeal of the proposed Mission 261 Development. The
support of our members has been invaluable and we are grateful to the
many people who have expressed their concerns to the City Council in
writing and through attendance at the council meetings. Over the summer,
a negotiation process took place as Mr. Harvey Ng worked with
representatives from the community to reduce the overall scale of his
project. Although Mr. Ng reduced the size of one building, no agreement
was reached on a specific project for the Mission 261 site.
At the August 18 council meeting, the City Council voted 4-1 against
continuing the revised project that Mr. Ng had presented that evening.
He was asked to return again to council on September 15 with a project
that fell into line with the standards specified in the Mission District
Specific Plan. Once again, we urge you to write to our council members
to let them know that it is important that they uphold the standards
established in the Mission District Specific Plan.
Clearly, new development and business in the Mission District would be
wonderful. However, the Mission District is the sole historic district
that the city has designated. This means that when someone comes to the
Mission District, the passage of time should be visible and, hopefully,
tangible. Walking less than a mile, we can span centuries of history:
Tongva artifacts (literally – watch for news on the excavation!), the
Mission, the early commercial buildings, the Playhouse, and the
neighborhoods that grew with the population. Two landmarks have
dominated the landscape of this district and continue to do so.
Therefore, our challenge is to strike a balance between economic
development and preservation.
The Mission District Specific Plan was created to articulate that
balance to residents and developers alike. The interest of the
Historical Association has been to speak for the value of that plan and
the standards it created to preserve the historic resources and
character of the Mission District. Those standards directly addressed
scale, density, and land use. The Board of the Historical Association
will welcome development that joins the historic fabric of the district.
Careful attention to the defining characteristics of the district will
allow for the historic district to absorb the continued change and the
march of time. Protecting the historic resources will preserve the
Mission District as a living history lesson to residents and visitors
alike.
Please continue to look for updated information on the Historical
Association’s website. And, please, continue to lend your voice to the
emerging discussion about the future of our Mission District. Over the
last six months we have seen the value of residents speaking for the
places that matter to them. We need you to continue to be a part of the
discussion.
CLICK HERE FOR TEMPLATE LETTER!
August 1, 2009 - LATEST NEWS!
At the April 21 meeting, the City Council voted to continue their
discussion on the appeal of the Mission 261 project. They also requested
that the developer return to council on August 18 with a design
that more accurately represented the vision and goals of the Mission
District Specific Plan.
Since that council meeting, a series of meetings have taken place
between the developer, Neighborhood Association, and city. The developer
has made changes to his plan. We would like to make you aware of those
changes but also highlight concerns that persist:
1. The project consists of two buildings: one that houses a hotel and
another that houses condos. The developer has modified the building with
condos. He has decreased the height and removed the underground parking.
However, the building containing the hotel remains unchanged in its
height and mass. Therefore, our concern remains. The clock tower still
soars to a height of 63 feet, rivaling the Mission Playhouse, and the
roof line exceeds the 40 feet allowed in the Mission District Specific
Plan.
2. The project still does not fall within the standards established by
the Mission District Specific Plan. While the developer has made
concessions on aspects of the project, he still plans to include a 54
room hotel. The Specific Plan acknowledges that a Bed and Breakfast
would be acceptable, but the proposed hotel is not a Bed and Breakfast.
3. The Mission District Specific Plan resulted from years of work and
consultation with residents. it was created to provide standards to
protect our historic district while allowing for economic development.
It is disconcerting that the standards of the Specific Plan could be
disregarded for a development in the core of the historic district. The
Board of the Historical Association wants our Council to be accountable
to the residents and their vision as it is expressed in the Specific
Plan.
The information below was taken from the City of
San Gabriel website. For more information click on:
Mission Village Project Returns to Council and scroll part way
down the page to the Mission Village section.
Mission Village Project Returns to Council
After conducting several meetings with affected residents, the developer
has proposed a revised plan that:
| |
Reduces the overall Floor
Area Ratio from 1.26 to 1.17 |
| |
Eliminates driveway access
on residential streets |
| |
Eliminates two levels of
underground parking, placing those spaces within the buildings |
| |
Reduces the height of
Building “B”, the condominium/retail building, and eliminates four
units |
| |
Reduces the amount of
restaurant space and eliminates a banquet room in the hotel |
| |
Reduces the size but not the
height of Building “A”, the hotel building |
Additional information can be found on the
City's Planning Division webpage.
Click here. to access the Planning website.
ORIGINAL PROPOSAL - MISSION 261 VILLAGE
PROJECT:
The owners of the existing Mission 261
Restaurant (formerly Old Panchitos) have proposed the Mission 261
Village Project. It entails the redevelopment of approximately 1.36
acres in the Mission District in Downtown San Gabriel. The proposed
project includes the demolition of existing structures and elimination
of the adjoining Park and Ride lot. The proposed mixed use project
consists two buildings which will emcompass:
|
Proposed Mission 261 Village Project |
| |
30 Condominium Units |
38,625 Square Feet
|
| |
Retail/Restaurant |
15,160 Square Feet |
| |
54 Room Boutique Hotel |
20, 636 Square Feet |
| |
Total Area: :
|
74,620 Square Feet |
| |
Underground parking
garage with 227 Parking Spaces |
|
Members of the Historical Association
have been following the Mission 261 Village Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) certification process as it progressed through planning commission
meetings. SGHA Trustees Ellie Andrews and Senya Lubisich both spoke at
the meetings against the variances and encroachments because they do not
adhere to the Mission District Specific Plan and because they are
bringing a density and scale that we felt compromises the integrity of
the historic district.
At the March 9 meeting, the City of San Gabriel Planning Commission
certified the Environmental Impact Report which allows the project to
move forward with various encroachments and variances. Once the EIR was
certified, we joined with others to file an appeal of the decision. That
appeal is scheduled for the Council Meeting on Tuesday, April 21st.
(Click here
to read the appeal)
This project brings a density and scale that compromises the integrity
of the historic district. We need your support in holding the City and
developer to the standards established in the Mission District Specific
Plan.
We urge members to write letters to San Gabriel Councilman David
Gutierrez. He is the council liaison for the project and we want him to
know that the historic integrity of the district and the vision
articulated in the Specific Plan is important to us. Send
your letters to:
| |
City of
San Gabriel |
| |
425 S.
Mission Drive |
| |
San
Gabriel, CA 91776 |
|
Attn:
Councilmember David Gutierrez |
A link to the Mission Specific Plan on
the City Website:
http://www.sgch.org/cityservices/communitydev/specificplans.shtml
A link to the Mission Village/Mission 261 EIR:
http://www.sangabrielcity.com/cityservices/communitydev/planning.shtml
We are trying to reach 2000 signatures - please sign here:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/29/protect-the-san-gabriel-mission-district |